From: Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: deleting articles from search groups?
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:44:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877hfk549r.fsf@uwo.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fwu8rrew.fsf@andy.bu.edu>
Andrew Cohen <cohen@andy.bu.edu> writes:
>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
> Lars> Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca> writes:
> >> It just occurred to me that some people use group parameters to
> >> have different expiry-wait periods for different groups. Will
> >> this above cause articles to expire based on the expiry-wait for
> >> the original group or whatever expiry-wait applies to the nnir
> >> group (probably the default global value)?
>
> Lars> The latter, I think. But the nnir groups are ephemeral,
> Lars> aren't they? So they shouldn't affect anything. Unless I'm
> Lars> misunderstanding everything.
>
> My message crossed yours. This is correct: ephemeral, so it shouldn't
> cause any trouble (and hasn't in my one week of minimal testing).
I thought the whole point of this thread was that deletion in an nnir
group *does* cause deletion of the original article. So I am assuming
that that holds as well for articles marked as expirable in an nnir
group.
So, say I do an nnir search, and the results contain an article in my
INBOX, which has a long expiry-wait. I mark it as expirable in the nnir
group, think that that will just cause the mark to propagate to the
INBOX, where the usual expiry process will happen. But when I exit the
nnir group, expiry runs, and the article disappears sooner than I
expected.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 21:17 Andrew Cohen
2010-11-28 23:25 ` Dan Christensen
2010-11-29 18:03 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-11-29 18:12 ` Rupert Swarbrick
2010-11-29 18:49 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-11-29 4:28 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-12-08 15:57 ` Andrew Cohen
2010-12-08 19:25 ` Dan Christensen
2010-12-08 19:31 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-12-08 19:33 ` Andrew Cohen
2010-12-08 21:44 ` Dan Christensen [this message]
2010-12-09 13:21 ` Andrew Cohen
2010-12-08 19:32 ` Andrew Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877hfk549r.fsf@uwo.ca \
--to=jdc@uwo.ca \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).