From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70330 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Git, ding-cvslog (gmane.emacs.gnus.cvs), ding-patches (gmane.emacs.gnus.commits) Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:05:47 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <877hj4cves.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87iq2prjr0.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87occhd85d.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrr58b9u.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87bp8gdfwt.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283421979 25389 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2010 10:06:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:06:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18716@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 02 12:06:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or6gT-0000iL-1V for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:06:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Or6gN-00078B-JA; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Or6gK-00077q-1s for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Or6gE-0002tT-Q3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Or6gD-0002gw-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:06:01 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or6gC-0000Y2-73 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:06:00 +0200 Original-Received: from c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.14.16.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:06:00 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:06:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7KGZZDz/TFTtEVJKu0nP733GU+Q= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70330 Archived-At: On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:57:29 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> OK, now post-receive will merge multiple commit messages into one long >> subject line and format the message as Adam proposed. Changes are in >> etc/post-receive and comitted. LMI> They now look like this: LMI> Subject: [git] Gnus Project branch, master, updated. 56bbe449783867ec4d9d92387172383531ead4ec Remove %O (moderated) from group line format, since it isn't very interesting. LMI> Isn't the first bit kinda not very interesting to humans? I mean the LMI> "[git] Gnus Project branch, master, updated. 56bbe449783867ec4d9d92387172383531ead4ec" LMI> bit. Does that have to be in the Subject header? Perhaps just "Gnus LMI> Project" is sufficient? The branch is necessary. "updated" denoted the action taken. The [git] prefix is, I think, a nice visual filter (especially since we set the sender to the author). "Gnus Project" is the Git repo's config description which we know. The revision ID could be omitted, sure. So maybe this is better. Subject: [gnus git] master updated. Remove %O (moderated) from group line format, since it isn't very interesting. I made the change after my last commit so the next push will show the new format. One inaccuracy is that with multiple authors, only the most recent one is used, and perhaps the comitter is the right name to put in From instead of the author. OTOH when Katsumi synchronizes, it's better to see who made the change originally. I'm open to suggestions. Ted