Re: [Patch] Make tls.el support certificate verification

[Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>]

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16 2007, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
>
>> Well, I sent ChangeLog entries a week ago (see [1] and [2]) but nothing
>> has shown up in cvs yet.  
>
> Sorry for the delay, I didn't have a change do commit your changes
> during the past week (I'm not at home and I don't have a reasonable
> internet connection at the moment).

Alright.  Thanks for clarifying.

[...]
>> This is particularly annoying if the message actually contains a
>> ready made patch to fix a bug and all I'm asking for is to review
>> the patch and tell me what's wrong with it so it can be committed
>> eventually.  
>
> If you don't get responses, please feel free to remind us about the
> issue.  (Before your papers had been arrived, we couldn't install your
> patches.)

Yes, I realise that and that's why I had hoped for a more timely
response to my ChangeLog entries since I had posted them after papers
had been signed.  Of course, there always is a chance for unfortunate
coincidences, so, thanks for your explanation.

[...]
>> This makes me wonder whether I should generally send patches to the
>> emacs-devel list rather than the ding list even if they concern the
>> gnus trunk.  
>
> Now that the Gnus trunk is also in Emacs trunk you may send it
> emacs-devel in this case as well.  But please keep ding copied too.

Actually, I'd prefer the ding list myself since it has much lower
traffic than emacs-devel.

Regards,

Elias