From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65706 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Elias Oltmanns Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [Patch] Make tls.el support certificate verification Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <877ikhlrgs.fsf@denkblock.local> References: <877imqtdhb.fsf@denkblock.local> <87zlzc35bh.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <87ps063ixd.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <87zlxo4lwr.fsf@denkblock.local> <87d4uaksur.fsf@denkblock.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195254500 28039 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2007 23:08:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 17 00:08:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItAIS-0004Ef-HB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:08:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAIE-0005Ox-Uf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAHw-0005Am-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:07:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAHv-0005AP-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAHv-0005AK-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ItAHv-0002vn-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ItAHl-00075j-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:07:41 +0000 Original-Received: from pd9e85068.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.232.80.104]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:07:41 +0000 Original-Received: from eo by pd9e85068.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:07:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 41 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9e85068.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Cancel-Lock: sha1:O49tRiUsFwaOOvbXT6lMJvIdaj0= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83388 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65706 Archived-At: Reiner Steib wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16 2007, Elias Oltmanns wrote: > >> Well, I sent ChangeLog entries a week ago (see [1] and [2]) but nothing >> has shown up in cvs yet. > > Sorry for the delay, I didn't have a change do commit your changes > during the past week (I'm not at home and I don't have a reasonable > internet connection at the moment). Alright. Thanks for clarifying. [...] >> This is particularly annoying if the message actually contains a >> ready made patch to fix a bug and all I'm asking for is to review >> the patch and tell me what's wrong with it so it can be committed >> eventually. > > If you don't get responses, please feel free to remind us about the > issue. (Before your papers had been arrived, we couldn't install your > patches.) Yes, I realise that and that's why I had hoped for a more timely response to my ChangeLog entries since I had posted them after papers had been signed. Of course, there always is a chance for unfortunate coincidences, so, thanks for your explanation. [...] >> This makes me wonder whether I should generally send patches to the >> emacs-devel list rather than the ding list even if they concern the >> gnus trunk. > > Now that the Gnus trunk is also in Emacs trunk you may send it > emacs-devel in this case as well. But please keep ding copied too. Actually, I'd prefer the ding list myself since it has much lower traffic than emacs-devel. Regards, Elias