From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65607 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: encrypt.el in No Gnus 0.7 Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:39:30 +0900 Message-ID: <877ikrncrh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87zly3y4ru.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <54a15d860711071658j40e1af43r6be4fb0f44ece932@mail.gmail.com> <54a15d860711071716g76be1cc1iaa340dce27a54896@mail.gmail.com> <54a15d860711081511l309d6be5tec3ba3c88e5ebfc3@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194590299 9391 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2007 06:38:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 06:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Daiki Ueno" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 09 07:38:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IqNVU-0002ui-FH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:38:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqNVI-0005S1-Nq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqNVE-0005Ri-V3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:38:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqNVC-0005RV-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:38:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqNVC-0005RS-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IqNV4-00014x-1m; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:37:54 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (unknown [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BD08002; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 15:37:50 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24F4D1A2E12; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 15:39:31 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <54a15d860711081511l309d6be5tec3ba3c88e5ebfc3@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" (+CVS-20070621) XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82844 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65607 Archived-At: Daiki Ueno writes: > I estimate the user base to be quite few. Think "insurance", not "daily use." If an advance in cryptography that threatens all of the usual algorithms or a major data theft based on cracking any of them occurs, suddenly all sorts of people for whom "pretty good privacy" used to be good enough will want more options.