michael@cadilhac.name (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:

> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
>
>>>>>>> In <87ac0lrea5.fsf@lrde.org> Michaël Cadilhac wrote:
>>
>>>> --- nntp.el	05 Feb 2006 14:56:44 +0100	1.31
>>>> +++ nntp.el	25 Dec 2006 13:48:53 +0100
>>>> @@ -451,10 +451,11 @@
>>>>  				wait-for nnheader-callback-function)
>>>>  	  ;; If nothing to wait for, still remove possibly echo'ed commands.
>>>>  	  ;; We don't have echos if nntp-open-connection-function
>>>> -	  ;; is `nntp-open-network-stream', so we skip this in that case.
>>>> +	  ;; is `nntp-open-network-stream' or `nntp-open-ssl-stream',
>>>> +	  ;; so we skip this in that cases.
>>>>  	  (unless (or wait-for
>>>> -		      (equal nntp-open-connection-function
>>>> -			     'nntp-open-network-stream))
>>>> +		      (memq nntp-open-connection-function
>>>> +			    '(nntp-open-network-stream nntp-open-ssl-stream)))
>>>>  	    (nntp-accept-response)
>>>>  	    (save-excursion
>>>>  	      (set-buffer buffer)
>>>>
>>>> Without it, I'm getting stuck after my message is posted (it is,
>>>> actually).
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if the patch makes sense, but can we discuss this bug?
>>
>> Well, I have no account on nntps servers.  It will be necessary
>> to verify that this change is harmless for every nntps server.
>> Can anyone do that?
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Anyone?..

Gimme a ?P! an ?I! an ?N! a ?G! Intern this and gimme a 'PING! Yeah!

... Well, just pinging.

-- 
 |      Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac     |  All your base are belong to us.       |
 |         Epita/LRDE Promo 2007     |    You have no chance to survive       |
 |  http://michael.cadilhac.name     |       make your time, hahaha.          |
 `--JID: michael.cadilhac@gmail.com--'       -- Zero Wings               -  --'