From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37473
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Nuutti Kotivuori <nuutti.kotivuori@smarttrust.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Cache abuse and article editing
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 18:10:17 +0300
Message-ID: <877kwjuahy.fsf@smarttrust.com>
References: <87g0b7uc5i.fsf@smarttrust.com>
        <m1k80jdg9m.fsf@reader.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172883 14106 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:01:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <nuutti.kotivuori@smarttrust.com>
Return-Path: <nuutti.kotivuori@smarttrust.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 18914 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2001 15:10:31 -0000
Original-Received: from smtp.dave.sonera.fi (131.177.130.21)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2001 15:10:31 -0000
Original-Received: from kotivnu1-nb.etela.sonera.fi ([131.177.205.219]:58135 "EHLO oro")
        by inside.dave.sonera.fi with ESMTP id <S56999AbRHDPK0>;
        Sat, 4 Aug 2001 18:10:26 +0300
Original-Received: from naked by oro with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian))
        id 15T34H-0004JC-00; Sat, 04 Aug 2001 18:10:21 +0300
Original-To: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
In-Reply-To: <m1k80jdg9m.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> (Harry Putnam's message of
 "04 Aug 2001 08:00:13 -0700")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)
Original-Lines: 18
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37473
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37473

Harry Putnam wrote:
> Nuutti Kotivuori <nuutti.kotivuori@smarttrust.com> writes:
> 
>> Hence I have been making a small patch to gnus to be able to edit
>> cached articles - and ask if you want to edit a cached copy instead
>> if you try to edit articles in a read-only backend.
>> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> Can this be extended to articles under agents control?.  I've often
> thought how nice it would be if agentized articles could share the
> many options that mail backend messages have.

I'd say that it works for agent if Simon Josefsson unifies agent and
cache. Otherwise I think it's a bit hard to do, maybe.

-- Naked