From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24977 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hannu Koivisto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [0.96] Print with faces or not -- how to decide? Date: 01 Sep 1999 09:47:49 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <877lmbw2ju.fsf@senstation.vvf.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162447 11620 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:07:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA01485 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 02:49:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB19969; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 01:49:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 01 Sep 1999 01:49:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA09709 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 01:49:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from senstation.vvf.fi (senstation.vvf.fi [195.74.10.211]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA01477 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 02:48:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from azure by senstation.vvf.fi with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 11M4BS-0003Tx-00; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:47:50 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24977 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:24977 Greetings, GNUS-SUMMARY-PRINT-ARTICLE uses PS-PRINT-BUFFER-WITH-FACES. This fails with at least Emacs 20.3 on tty. ps-print eventually ends up calling X-COLOR-VALUES, which is defined (it only checks for it being defined), and that dies with "Non X-frame" message or something like that. I thought to write a fix for this but after trying few approaches for deciding whether to print with faces or not, I finally got myself convinced that I don't know what I /really/ should test for. Anyone? -- Hannu