From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8180 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Pakaste Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Reading mail on two different hosts Date: 04 Oct 1996 08:30:42 +0300 Sender: jurip@cc.Helsinki.FI Message-ID: <877mp747p9.fsf@cyteen.Helsinki.FI> References: <87iv8sj7nc.fsf@cyteen.Helsinki.FI> Reply-To: pakaste@cc.Helsinki.FI NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.82) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148383 10577 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:13:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA00726 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 22:49:40 -0700 Original-Received: from cyteen.Helsinki.FI (jurip@vuoro.in.Helsinki.FI [128.214.182.64]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 4 Oct 1996 07:32:26 +0200 Original-Received: (from jurip@localhost) by cyteen.Helsinki.FI (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA00589; Fri, 4 Oct 1996 08:30:42 +0300 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/XEmacs 19.14 In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 03 Oct 1996 20:05:07 +0200 Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8180 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8180 >>>>> "KG" == Kai Grossjohann writes: >>>>> Juri Pakaste writes: Juri> I'm trying to set up Gnus so that I could read the mailing Juri> lists I subscribe both on the university computers and at Juri> home. The idea is that Gnus (or perhaps procmail) would split KG> That's what Soup is for. On your home computer, you set up Gnus (...) Oh, yeah... I'd forgotten SOUP could be used for mail, too. It does have the problem that I have to manually brew and pack the soups, and then transfer them home, etc. Of course, it isn't that big a job, and at least the trasferring part can be somewhat automated (in fact, just as much as with my original idea) with correctly placed calls to shell scripts or elisp functions. OTOH, it certainly is far better than nothing, and I'll probably do it that way if I can't come up with a way to avoid the brewing and packing part. Thanks for the suggestion. -- Juri Pakaste/Juri.Pakaste@Helsinki.FI