From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 18964 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2020 03:17:37 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Dec 2020 03:17:37 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1krueb-00FZuE-Ex for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:17:33 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kruea-001XIw-TQ for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:17:32 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1krueY-001XIj-VD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:17:30 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1krueW-0049VJ-5q for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:17:30 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=H+B50uqeBqE2xWzl/AGl13iHx02VUTFPTFsqtIH9+0E=; b=nJQ0OHCY0cdv+3wDz60JlCAM0K dGNrkHcwwy7mAuM+rODIS40zIXlkgFH0vq8Ik6kWVBtmpkCVK/xWmEecYTctVj5tDr3N7d4KCrEZP RcMCfKZTboCGH0RWjfsOs8+hUaIuCn1BhgG8lOPc42NFHq8hax4VlO+XrFt7FFkir4C8=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krueK-00084C-U4 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 04:17:23 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krueH-00053n-H4 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 04:17:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: is there updated archived-at link in gmane.io) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 04:17:07 +0100 Message-ID: <878s9pb498.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <874kkd4v1f.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> <87h7odyac2.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:x3+Wf7OyQlWHN7yKq746KR+t5jY= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > Another story: Still Lars has to do *recovery* for gmane.org > domain, i guess. Also a few hours ago i did check some whois > information [...] I'm not sure what you are saying here but it feels like if active development is done on Gmane removing that header seems like a trivial task. I might be wrong tho and as for me, that header certainly doesn't bug or annoy me. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal