From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86106 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Reply-prefix ("Re:") default regex Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:52:02 +0800 Message-ID: <878u9bvqjh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87si7l4ndw.fsf@denknerd.org> <87oai84w08.fsf@denknerd.org> <87mvxsim78.fsf@free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439697328 15951 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2015 03:55:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 03:55:28 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M34340@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Aug 16 05:55:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQp2Q-0004ps-WE for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:55:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQp2L-0001sL-1F; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQp2J-0001rp-0C for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:55:07 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQp2I-0002Uy-Bc for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQp2G-0005Gg-Vq for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:55:05 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQp2F-0004hX-6E for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:55:03 +0200 Original-Received: from 50.56.99.223 ([50.56.99.223]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:55:03 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 50.56.99.223 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:55:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 50.56.99.223 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HdwcC8C9UZsS9VetTIUdqg6nZNg= X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0007 Ham tokens: 0.000-495--23775h-0s--0d--patch, 0.000-347--16660h-0s--0d--PATCH, 0.000-292--14030h-0s--0d--Aug, 0.000-8--361h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-8--359h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs Spam tokens: 0.994-11057--380h-7177s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-11057--380h-7177s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-external:quimby.gnus.org, 0.994-10424--381h-6780s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.993-10979--458h-7177s--0d--H*RT:quimby.gnus.org, 0.993-10979--458h-7177s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0007] 2.0 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86106 Archived-At: Peter Münster writes: > On Sat, Aug 15 2015, Paul van der Walt wrote: > >> Of course, i could understand if such cultural (non-anglophone?) cruft >> were undesirable in the Gnus code base, but perhaps others might benefit >> from this. > > It's useful and I don't see any problem with that patch. Perhaps you > should repost it with a subject like "[PATCH] ..." or do M-x gnus-bug. But this is already a customization option, shouldn't we just let users customize it? Is this one tweak worth it?