From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82874 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mml-insert-tag: insert closing tag Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:57:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <878v7bt2mm@ch.ristopher.com> References: <87r4l33mmj@ch.ristopher.com> <87fw1juo2q@ch.ristopher.com> <87a9rrukv5@ch.ristopher.com> <87wquvt5hq@ch.ristopher.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359539833 9680 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2013 09:57:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:57:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31140@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jan 30 10:57:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U0UQ8-0003mH-Cz for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:57:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1U0UPo-0000rk-S2; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:57:12 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1U0UPl-0000rJ-Te for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:57:09 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U0UPk-0002Kv-8y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:57:09 -0600 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93] helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U0UPi-0006T7-RJ for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:57:06 +0100 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 49D6520421; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:57:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1359539825; bh=D9cbG1Xd1UyH+vh8tywZdqgP5iFkuFSMSjxQPGNo41U=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=xZKawyKT8u5nKVVsJiDld94bxMhMe6HKztl3turIJ4pdE4anji+7a+/+ecUfnfDms jncCSnvFYAmHomYXIoeTz97D4ju8JeLZYzBBGjQuwFBsK3KTSoOQqMPj4uAtfq3DTc DNSzOJgHWS8L/rjpeJ9rXBHO7qSg4fsiyUOvx2+A= In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:35:12 +0900") Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82874 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Christopher Schmidt wrote: >>> I see. So, how about putting a closing tag only when it is in >>> the middle of a message buffer? > >> I don't know. I guess this is a reasonable default behaviour. I >> (personally) always want an end tag, though. > > Ok, it's a sound argument anyway. I'm going to install your patch. > Er, if there is a single empty line between the open and the end > tags, doesn't it make a user recall one should start writing there? This is up to personal preference. I never write something in between the tags. I yank or use C-u M-! - right after C-c RET C-p. To me, an empty line in between the tags is unnecessary. Christopher