From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78564 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: The new registry errors when spam.el is moving messages Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:26:43 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878vv3qrjw.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <877hap1bol.fsf@member.fsf.org> <8739ld198t.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87d3kgepq9.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303417679 14174 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2011 20:27:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 20:27:59 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26867@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Apr 21 22:27:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0Tj-000240-RC for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:27:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0Sq-000404-3W; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:27:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0Sp-0003zv-0x for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:26:59 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0So-0006mo-9J for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0Sl-0000eu-E8 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QD0Sl-0001PF-Cg for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:26:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cpFTJQQlgLQOWWWnO2cz2xitfs4= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78564 Archived-At: On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:05:05 +0900 Katsumi Yamaoka wrote: KY> Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> You mean the mail-header or the CL changes? KY> I meant `mail-header', that never works unless the variable named KY> `headers' is bound. Try: (mail-header "Cc" nil) KY> So I replaced it with things similar to the original. And I noticed, KY> it never works, either. In `gnus-registry-action': ... I fixed this: we need to use the extra header slot (`mail-header-extra') and that's an alist of headers. But the user needs to add To and Cc to `gnus-extra-headers', so I explained that in the package commentary. I actually think To and Cc should be in `gnus-extra-headers' by default. Is there any reason not to add them? The extra memory usage is negligible. >> It was working fine for me before the changes. KY> Because some mis-designed functions are hidden by `ignore-errors', KY> I thought. Yes. Oh, but it was nicely quiet, wasn't it? ;) >> Other than the bug Andre Cohen reported with followed-groups, KY> Although I've never used it, I can imagine it doesn't work for To KY> and Cc headers. That's why I feel it incomplete. To achieve it, KY> maybe other Gnus resources need to be changed. Fortunately I think we're OK now. Thanks for working on this. Ted