From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75129 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tibor Simko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: latest sources do not client-split IMAP anymore Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:13 +0100 Organization: CERN -- European Organization for Nuclear Research Message-ID: <878vzpbpme.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> References: <8739q0tdai.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> <87fwtz4vfj.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> <8762uun3lg.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292520141 13025 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2010 17:22:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:22:21 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23484@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Dec 16 18:22:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHWu-0008Pt-Dg for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:22:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHWK-0003dU-8D; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:21:36 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHWI-0003dF-WC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:21:35 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHWH-0001Rv-O0 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:21:34 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHWH-0004sm-0X for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:33 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTHWB-0007v3-PU for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:27 +0100 Original-Received: from pb-d-128-141-28-53.cern.ch ([128.141.28.53]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:27 +0100 Original-Received: from tibor.simko by pb-d-128-141-28-53.cern.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pb-d-128-141-28-53.cern.ch Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UQoM7lTP5hrj8L4lTz9aDIGU+2E= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75129 Archived-At: On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > That's even more incomprehensible. Your patch just put > > (gnus-read-active-file nil nil) > > into `gnus-setup-news'. Yes, `(gnus-read-active-file nil nil)' helps in that place. Note that it used to be there since 1997, see commit b9299e2. Maybe the internal function call order during `gnus-setup-news' is important? If I eval the above after gnus started, then it does not help anymore. Would you like me to edebug something more concretely? Best regards -- Tibor Simko