From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72351 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:01:34 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <878w2j57c1.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87fwww1bht.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v8cxud8.fsf@jumptrading.com> <87ocbgwc8u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87iq1n8dtk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4m3i19x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ocbfaw0t.fsf@uwo.ca> <87k4m359kz.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285876950 26429 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 20:02:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:02:30 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20724@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 30 22:02:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1PKm-0004oj-4u for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:02:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1PKE-00073G-N2; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1PKA-00072h-7J for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1PK5-00017f-5r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P1PK4-0004Ao-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:01:44 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1PK1-0004Yr-Rm for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:01:41 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:01:41 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:01:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YENsMP8cKqnD770q8NRprY3rh7A= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72351 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:42:29 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Hm. Yes, the problem is that nnmail-split-methods should just have LMI> allowed fancy splits directly, without going via a second function... LMI> But since it is that way, I'll just add a nnimap-split-methods-fancy LMI> variable. That will certainly work for now. But since we seem to be OK with rethinking how splitting works, can we consider merging normal and fancy splitting? It's pretty easy to tell the two formats apart and it would simplify the splitting logic and the manual. Ted