From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70512 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:00:06 +0200 Organization: m Message-ID: <878w3gmp55.fsf@nemi.mork.no> References: <87pqwslybb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj7g7j5s.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283693175 28664 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2010 13:26:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 13:26:15 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18887@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 05 15:26:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsFEb-0005fT-IS for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:26:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsFEa-0002v7-Ca; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsD22-0001eZ-Oi for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OsD21-0000Q3-A4 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OsD20-0006rF-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:05:04 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsD20-0001P3-Il for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:05:04 +0200 Original-Received: from nemi.mork.no ([148.122.252.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:05:04 +0200 Original-Received: from bjorn by nemi.mork.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:05:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nemi.mork.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:drP0NhysdcLUpr9uwF23b7S7+do= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70512 Archived-At: Steinar Bang writes: >>>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > >> ... I prefer this setup to server-side splitting because of my >> gnus-registry and spam-split needs. > > Right. I tried it, and dropped it, back in... whenever... (1999-2000 or > thereabouts) because I found it too slow. It was better to have the > email presplit when I wanted to read it. I do both, depending on the server capabilities. One of the IMAP servers I use doesn't support any fancy server side splitting. But server-side splitting is preferred when available. Bjørn