From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70097 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Fancy completion Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:22:11 +0200 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Message-ID: <878w3oezak.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> References: <871v9gkol2.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87tymct2zw.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283192553 16998 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2010 18:22:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:22:33 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18483@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Aug 30 20:22:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq900-0003Am-CB for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:22:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8zw-0008Co-2V; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8zu-0008CX-RE for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8zt-0008Eg-Ps for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Oq8zt-0007Y4-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:22:21 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oq8zr-00033A-6i for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:22:19 +0200 Original-Received: from rain.gmane.org ([80.91.229.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:22:19 +0200 Original-Received: from asjo by rain.gmane.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:22:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rain.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: )qY&CseJ?.:=8F#^~GcSA?F=9eu'{KAFfL1C3/A&:nE?PW\i65"ba0NS)97,Q(^@xk}n4Ou rPuR#V8I(J_@~H($[ym:`K_+]*kjvW>xH5jbgLBVFGXY:(#4P>zVBklLbdL&XxL\M)%T}3S/IS9lMJ ^St'=VZBR Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70097 Archived-At: On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:45:38 +0100, Leo wrote: > It looks like the best way forward for the XEmacs project is to re-fork. I don't think that makes sense. > I think a huge amount of work has been merged into Emacs while XEmacs > stands still. More or less, yes. I still like a lot of things about XEmacs better than GNU Emacs, so it won't be easy for me to switch. :-), Adam -- "Vegetarian progressive grindcore" Adam Sjøgren asjo@koldfront.dk