"Daiki Ueno" <ueno@unixuser.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> 2007/8/27, Michaël Cadilhac <michael@cadilhac.name>:
>> "Daiki Ueno" <ueno@unixuser.org> writes:
>> Hi! Is it on purpose that you removed the ding ML?
>
> No, I just sent it via gmail which I'm not familiar with.

Yeah, I know that. Such a PIT posterior.

> However, if NotDashEscaped is removed, we should also treat the
> original text as *not* dash-escaped.  Otherwise, the contents you will
> see is not what signed in the clearsigned message.  I personally think
> this is not a big problem though.

I don't really understand, the NotDashEscaped header is not used to
compute the signature, is it?

> I was saying that it is straightforward to make use of GnuPG's output
> rather than to decode/reformat dash-escaped text by Gnus itself.

I fail to see the link with the current conversation :-/  This is mainly
due to my poor knowledge in the matter ;-)

-- 
 |   Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac       |  Perhaps we should start               |
 |   http://michael.cadilhac.name   |     making protest releases            |
 |   JID/MSN:                       |   before doing a fall release.         |
 `----  michael.cadilhac@gmail.com  |          -- David Kastrup         -  --'