>> On 17 May 2004 10:12:48 -0400
>> tzz@lifelogs.com ("Ted Zlatanov") said as follows:

>> Your fix is as insufficient as my proposal, I think.

>Can you be specific as to why?

The reason was quite simple: both my proposed patch and your fix did
not cover all misleading messages.

>I tried to fix those as well.  Fixes in CVS - let me know what you
>think.

They work fine.

However, I am afraid that the condition to display status messages may
conflict with the condition to process articles in spam/ham processing
routines in the future.  So, I'd like to propose the attached change,
which simplifies the condition to display status messages.

-- 
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi