Re: A P documentation could be enhanced

[Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de>]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Looking at the code, it doesn't really look like it does anything
> with process-marked articles:
>
>   (interactive (list (ps-print-preprint current-prefix-arg)))
>
> (Unless the `ps-print-preprint' function does some magic here; I
> haven't looked at it.)

Indeed, it is unlikely that ps-print-preprint is doing Gnus magic.

In that case, I think the docstring is confusingly worded.  (At least
it confused this lowly poster.)  It talks at length about the N arg,
and only mentions the FILENAME arg in passing.  Even though it was not
stated explicitly, I thought that N was the prefix arg.

(And the part that says if N is nil and some articles are
process-marked, print those instead, is probably wrong.)

Kai, who should be fixing instead of complaining