>>>>> "asf" == Andreas Fuchs writes:

 asf> Today, Vasily Korytov <deskpot@myrealbox.com> wrote:
 >> I can prefer having PGP/MIME for one recipient, and old style PGP for
 >> another. 

 asf> IMHO, there is no way to prefer one over the other: If there are mime
 asf> parts in the message, it should be signed as a multipart, and if there
 asf> is no mime part in it, gnus should not put one in, for size and
 asf> compatibility considerations.

Ha. Seems, you simply don't know much about ``compatibility
considerations''. Some MUAs only have the support for RFC1991, some --
only for 2015. So there's a good reason to specify it sometimes
manually.

Next, I prefer PGP/MIME, where it's possible -- because it's a much more
cleaner standard. Why can't I do so? Why should I be forced to use
RFC1991-style PGP only because you think it's the right choice?

---Vas