Re: pgg doesn't seem to like me

[jam@jamux.com (John A. Martin)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson
>>>>> "Re: pgg doesn't seem to like me"
>>>>>  Sun, 06 Oct 2002 02:03:35 +0200

    Simon> Uhm, are there any other outstanding PGG problems?  [...]
    Simon> Or PGP/MIME and S/MIME problems in general?

When compiling cvs gnus (about 12:30 GMT 8 Aug) atop XEmacs-21.4.8
(xemacs21-nomule_21.4.8-2_i386.deb), Emacs complained about the
following:

mm-url.el:
  ** the function encode-coding-string is not known to be defined.

mm-util.el:
  ** the function detect-coding-region is not known to be defined.

pgg-parse.el:
  ** reference to free variable pgg-parse-crc24
  ** The following functions are not known to be defined: 
    define-ccl-program, ccl-execute-on-string, pgg-parse-crc24-string

pgg.el:
  ** The following functions are not known to be defined: 
    decode-coding-region, encode-coding-region

spam.el:
  ** The following functions are not known to be defined: 
    bbdb-search, bbdb-records, display-message-or-buffer

The spam.el complaints have already been given by Katsumi Yamaoka.  Is
it in general appropriate to put compiler complaints like this to this
news group when someone is not "asking for trouble :)"?

What is a convenient unambiguous way to identify the particular cvs
version used?  How come folks don't often seem to bother?

        jam

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAj2i34oACgkQUEvv1b/iXy/vLACdEu0I/0ZYcuDIeF+H/yHJVB9k
xpsAmQGudWtpUB4lJjgkxZ/zMx7Ql1u2
=Ctyl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----