From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36068 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: security: Encrypted mail in the archive Date: 29 Apr 2001 19:30:12 +0200 Message-ID: <878zkjbom3.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171716 6596 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:41:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 3825 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2001 17:17:08 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 3820 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2001 17:17:08 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 17:17:08 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.39 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m14tuol-001WzOC; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14tuoI-000890-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:16:38 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14tv1Q-0001HA-00 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:30:12 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Andreas Fuchs's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2001 16:48:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 10 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36068 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36068 Andreas Fuchs writes: > I just saw something that shocked me. I had sent an encrypted mail to a > friend of mine and tried to read it in the archive. Guess what? > > The mail that is stored in my archive group is not encrypted in any > way. If this is not acceptable in your environment, you need a cryptographic filesystem anyway, so I don't consider this a problem.