From: Bruce Stephens <bruce+gnus@cenderis.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: S/MIME suggestions
Date: 30 Nov 2000 00:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878zq2mh6t.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <iluitp6323l.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
> Bruce Stephens <bruce+gnus@cenderis.demon.co.uk> writes:
[...]
> > Openssl allows this using the -noverify flag. So (in a pleasantly
> > contradictory fashion), "openssl smime -verify -noverify ..." makes
> > perfect sense.
>
> Yes. What would good defaults be? First try to verify
> message+certificate, with fall back to simply verify the message?
> In the second case, it could say something along the lines of
>
> [[S/MIME Signed: OK (Untrusted CA))]]
>
> What do you think?
Yes, probably. The way Outlook Express does it (by default) is a bit
OTT, but it expresses the various possibilities. When you open a
signed and/or encrypted message, you get a screen with a number of
items on it, with ticks or crosses by them. I forget exactly the
list, but it'll include things like "signature verifies", "certificate
trusted", "certificate issuer trusted", "certificate subject matches
from address", and so on. (Things for expiry, too, I guess.)
Then you need to click again to get to the message (which is what
sucks---Netscrape does this much less intrusively, and much more
appropriately, IMHO---also, when it's an encrypted message that you
can't decrypt, it won't even show you the (unencrypted) headers, which
is really dumb).
However, there seem to be a number of possibilities. I think I'd like
to be able to trust a CA, but still be warned if something signed by a
certificate issued by it (i.e., I'd have a list of generally trusted
CAs, but mostly I'd explicitly trust individual certificates).
Anyway, this is making real progress---S/MIME support seems to be
approaching PGP's in usability.
> > Also, "openssl smime -verify ... -signer <file>" extracts the
> > certificate (presuming there is one). That strikes me as a very
> > convenient feature to use. Especially considering that "openssl x509
> > -email -noout -in <cert>.pem" prints out a list of email addresses for
> > the given certificate, which would presumably allow Gnus to check that
> > the email addresses match with the From header.
>
> I've added support for this now.
>
> This message should be an example of this, if you got the verisign
> cert in your CA path, it should say "Sender forged" (you might need to
> do `W s' if you disabled auto-verification). If you click on the
> button it should display the certificate found in this message so you
> can spot why it happened.
OK, I'll try reading it when I've updated my Gnus.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-30 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-01 22:38 S/MIME Bruce Stephens
2000-11-04 14:23 ` S/MIME ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-05 2:13 ` S/MIME Simon Josefsson
2000-11-05 5:43 ` S/MIME ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-05 12:18 ` S/MIME Simon Josefsson
2000-11-05 13:36 ` S/MIME ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-05 14:14 ` S/MIME Simon Josefsson
2000-11-28 0:08 ` S/MIME suggestions Bruce Stephens
2000-11-29 21:22 ` Simon Josefsson
2000-11-30 0:34 ` Bruce Stephens [this message]
2000-11-30 9:54 ` Simon Josefsson
2000-11-30 1:25 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2000-11-30 2:00 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-11-30 9:36 ` Simon Josefsson
2001-01-15 17:09 ` Simon Josefsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878zq2mh6t.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk \
--to=bruce+gnus@cenderis.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).