From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 26839 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2023 11:41:18 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Oct 2023 11:41:18 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qqu44-00CBEJ-0N for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:41:16 -0500 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qqu43-007rcU-1L for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:41:15 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qqu40-007rcL-2Z for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:41:12 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qqu3w-006E07-0q for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:41:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1U8NmDdASEsq52mke0IRDL14eNAQ2Nv3oTN8eD7E1yo=; b=GEi3NCGl29i/HiW1c2EKbAXMQz j3gyQOa56y10ajDoNuCux34ZGbEP1G6o7JKspNz/s2wboEZDWRzp5vzmyMawqYV6WhP0vLZgsZhJM kDilWw28NdDbzJqD1K1vA2CH4sgnWuEe+d6jKK3jIRwTXJ+qaalrDqOXxcL+unSkeI7c=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qqu3o-0006pw-GG for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:41:03 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qqu3m-0004gp-GI for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:40:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: Adaptive scoring is enabled but does not take effect Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:40:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5so83wc.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <24501.9203097158$1697075047@news.gmane.org> <87lec88uva.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87y1g86zls.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:m+rxEPr2ILdG2wfbgchPST0ZiyY= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Eric S Fraga wrote: >> So my question is, do you really need elaborate scoring >> schemes for that small volume of messages? > > Scoring (in gnus) is not just for "newsgroups", it works > very well for email. Yes, I expect it to work the same way for all groups, however the OP had just 2 low/moderate traffic MLs (as Gmane groups) and 7 Usenet newsgroups. > I get several hundred emails a day and scoring (adaptive and > pre-defined) is indispensable in handling the volume. Several hundred emails every day? Yikes! And you grep the subject line for "Eric!!!" to find out which ones to read? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal