From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87971 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: warn about a BCC field Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:12:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87a7u6jdvy.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87d1eaa0q2.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87d0z51px0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87vacualzc.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87k1tasuz9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87lgdqakkw.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87woxayfj8.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87y3hq924h.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87lgdqn3lf.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <877epal0m2.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87r2ni9kpm.fsf@tullinup.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523700655 14118 195.159.176.226 (14 Apr 2018 10:10:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 10:10:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36185@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Apr 14 12:10:51 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.35]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7I8x-0003ZT-Az for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:10:51 +0200 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048035.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 5cc0ff91-3fcc-11e8-a660-b499baabecb2; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 10:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f7IAV-0004TM-35; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 05:12:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f7IAS-0004Sd-B5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 05:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f7IAR-0001EO-3N for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 05:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (helo=blaine.gmane.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1f7IAE-0007Bp-QA for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:12:14 +0200 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f7I84-0002SZ-Rp for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:09:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:olKFBFd5pFht98FmM21fcHzwJlo= X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.1585 Ham tokens: 0.000-159--6005h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-82--3085h-0s--0d--Apr, 0.000-13--489h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-13--482h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-11--387h-0s--0d--H*UA:gnu Spam tokens: 0.997-31115--580h-25321s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.997-18310--350h-14907s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:sk:junkmas, 0.997-18310--350h-14907s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:junkmas, 0.997-18310--350h-14907s--0d--H*RT:sk:junkmas, 0.995-32064--972h-26392s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.1585] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87971 Archived-At: > Uwe writes: > You keep saying this, and it keeps being baffling. > Are you SURE that the email you are looking at is one you _received_ and > not a copy that was _stored_ in your local archive (equivalent of "Sent" > folder)? Well now I tried out the webmail interface of this particular gmail account and the fields from: Uwe Brauer to: Uwe Brauer cc: Uwe Brauer bcc: Uwe Brauer date: Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 12:07 PM subject: test bcc via webmail mailed-by: mat.ucm.es Then after sending in my INBOX there is a message which contains the BCC field. And I received mails from colleagues which contained BCC fields Ok what about the following? I sent you offline a mail with a BCC field and you tell me whether you can see it? That would settle it? I did that sending to my other gmail account and in that INOBOX I could see the BCC field. Would you do that experiment? Uwe