From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-summary-save-article: xemacs better than GNU emacs? Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:01:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87a8ln7wy4.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <8760wcb40f.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <874mbvs6s4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458896599 25255 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2016 09:03:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M35191@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Mar 25 10:03:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajNe0-0002o6-Ix for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:03:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajNd7-0007FT-4u; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 04:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajNd3-0007Ey-VT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 04:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ajNd2-0005yr-AL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 04:02:01 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ajNd0-0005Au-Ub for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:01:58 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ajNcv-0002Gk-Hd for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:01:53 +0100 Original-Received: from 2.163.10.228 ([2.163.10.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:01:53 +0100 Original-Received: from oub by 2.163.10.228 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:01:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.163.10.228 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LaoWMmhGcalYeCimnWv8MxfQVGk= X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.4.1 2015-04-28) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4841 Ham tokens: 0.000-91--4222h-0s--0d--gnu, 0.000-82--3810h-0s--0d--GNU, 0.000-6--257h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-5--226h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-5--224h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs Spam tokens: 0.998-388--5h-255s--0d--Hx-spam-relays-internal:sk:junkmas, 0.998-388--5h-255s--0d--HX-Envelope-From:sk:junkmas, 0.998-388--5h-255s--0d--H*RT:sk:junkmas, 0.993-16837--676h-11365s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.993-17703--760h-11982s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no autolearn_force=no -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4841] 1.5 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 No description available. List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86970 Archived-At: > Uwe Brauer writes: > Check the docstring of `gnus-default-article-saver'. It mentions > that the function symbols that that option points to can have > properties, one of which is :decode. I'm guessing this is the > source of your issue. That sounds reasonable, thanks for pointing it out, however, at least for me, the docstring does not really explain how to include the :decode property. > (get 'gnus-summary-save-in-file :decode)-->t I tried that out: (for me this was not obvious,) and saved again the message > Maybe play with that and see if it fixes the issue? It does, thanks a lot Uwe