From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/85548 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Recent Emacs doesn't respect my mailcap Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:42:56 +1100 Message-ID: <87a915c5an.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87386xf5gx.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87386xdmzp.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87h9vdc7cn.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87egqhrmzv.fsf@gmx.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422326795 15010 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2015 02:46:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Rasmus Original-X-From: ding-owner+M33788@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jan 27 03:46:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YFwAi-00032o-Jc for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:46:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YFwAB-0008OI-3Y; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:45:59 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1YFwA8-0008O4-Fb for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:45:56 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YFwA7-0008N4-Hk for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:45:56 -0600 Original-Received: from smtp.syd.comcen.com.au ([203.23.236.77]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFw9q-00013u-E7 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:45:44 +0100 Original-Received: from building.gnus.org ([27.96.197.126]) by smtp.syd.comcen.com.au (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id t0R2h1sa043798; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:43:02 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87egqhrmzv.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:11:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-comcen-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-comcen-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-comcen-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.1, required 4, AWL -0.00, BAYES_50 0.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-comcen-MailScanner-From: larsi@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:85548 Archived-At: Rasmus writes: >> Is that a bug or is it supposed to be that way? > > A bug, I hope! It was just me putting a non-existent viewer into the ~/.mailcap file, so it was filtered out again later. So that bit works. So the issue is really whether we should keep preferring Lisp-based (internal) viewers over external ones, even though the user has specified this in ~/.mailcap (or otherwise). That way of sorting seems to have been in place since 1998. But is it a good idea? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/