From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84180 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Emacs Cloud Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:53:08 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87a9e7f39n.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <877g9fxwih.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87r47ni1mu.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87k3deo8y0.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87mwiaqzjj.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txcimrsc.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87ha8impk9.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87eh3mqf4t.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <871tzmm6yz.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87vbwyks3h.fsf@building.gnus.org> <8761oxqvrp.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87ha8hf7ow.fsf@building.gnus.org> <878uttf6bu.fsf@building.gnus.org> <8738k1f586.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87r47klisw.fsf@randomsample.de> <87sis0fieb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ioswkzu7.fsf@randomsample.de> Reply-To: ding@gnus.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391518454 19723 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2014 12:54:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:54:14 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32432@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 04 13:54:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAfW3-0004wM-7Z for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:54:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WAfVC-000832-Ph; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:53:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WAfVB-00082s-9m for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:53:21 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WAfV9-0001bs-KZ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 06:53:20 -0600 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WAfV7-00043x-Ok for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:53:17 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAfV6-0004R8-EO for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:53:16 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:53:16 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:53:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:br6E/eOH/GJQiXxvnLyDzXTfNUQ= X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84180 Archived-At: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:58:24 +0100 David Engster wrote: DE> Tassilo Horn writes: >> David Engster writes: >> >>> Note that you can install GnuPG 1.x alongside GnuPG 2.x with no >>> problems, and every recent distribution I know has packages for both. >> >> As far as I can see, Arch has only the current 2.0.22 version in its >> official repository. There's a gnupg1 package with version 1.4.16 in >> the user repository, though, but its unlikely that people have that >> installed. DE> Oh well, Arch users run into problems all the time anyway. They are DE> usually also not afraid of doing some reading, so they'll have to learn DE> about the agent and set it up properly. It's not always an option. Please don't explain this away as a user problem that can be remedied by education and effort. Not everyone matches the "single user, single desktop" use case. Ted