From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/83496 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: imap splitting to mail.misc? Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:54:01 +0800 Message-ID: <87a9lz10va.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87y59pl6cp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87txkdz1dp.fsf@enricoschumann.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373256153 2593 80.91.229.3 (8 Jul 2013 04:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 04:02:33 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31756@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jul 08 06:02:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uw2en-0003XI-6O for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 06:02:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Uw2cy-0008EC-DN; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 23:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Uvg2o-0003cl-Ln for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uvg2m-00044K-Og for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:53:50 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Uvg2k-0007Hu-Ov for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:53:46 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uvg2j-0005dd-Pc for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:53:45 +0200 Original-Received: from 114.250.115.98 ([114.250.115.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:53:45 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 114.250.115.98 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 05:53:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 37 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.250.115.98 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y8/ANfkkRDVaE1uuuY2kz16Z/YU= X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-123--908h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-87--644h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-87--644h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-82--605h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-82--605h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux Spam tokens: 0.991-5035--269h-21518s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.990-10446--614h-44873s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.990-9973--595h-42876s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.988-10300--760h-44874s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.988-10300--760h-44874s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no 2.1 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83496 Archived-At: Enrico Schumann writes: > On Tue, 02 Jul 2013, Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > > [...] > >> >> And is it actually a mistake to leave anything in INBOX? Or rather, a >> mistake to split things *back* into the INBOX? Maybe I should be making >> myself a separate box and splitting all unmatched messages into that? >> But I would still have to assume that some messages would end up in >> "mail.misc", as they do now... >> > > Hm, I don't use nnimap-split-fancy, but nnimap-split-rule. Then you > don't need a 'catch-all' split rule. From the manual: > > "Nnmail users might recollect that the last regexp had to be empty to > match all articles [...]. This is not required in nnimap. Articles > not matching any of the regexps will not be moved out of your inbox." > > But that does not explain where "mail.misc" comes from.... > > Regards, > Enrico With a little help off-list, I think I've figured it out. I've been using bbdb/gnus-split-method, both with nnmail and nnimap. It appears that, with nnimap, the value of bbdb/gnus-split-default-group comes into play. That defaults to "mail.misc", and switching it to "INBOX" solved the problem. Why it was putting some messages into "mail.misc" and leaving others in "INBOX" is a different mystery. E