From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/82867 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mml-insert-tag: insert closing tag Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:37:51 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <87a9rrukv5@ch.ristopher.com> References: <87r4l33mmj@ch.ristopher.com> <87fw1juo2q@ch.ristopher.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359535079 30884 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2013 08:37:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:37:59 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31133@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jan 30 09:38:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U0TBT-0000vr-8z for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:38:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1U0TB7-0000IG-Iq; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:37:57 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1U0TB6-0000I6-Gx for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:37:56 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U0TB5-0004JH-92 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:37:56 -0600 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93] helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U0TB3-0004d1-FT for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:37:53 +0100 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 6AF1620421; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:37:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1359535071; bh=OPUSXVBthNNtS9XG/AaO2pWEvmBhYe6LTlyfJt7uv64=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=K2nA4Tnv+1+kG9bUxJVl57GFxQPan4TacMPI/tVudbGV5dc+xv0b4rn+XG30wuasR z2rzYC0WIM6Dgk54wSEllX7PXBTRTxqZZGPwSOusFafIY/DVt5w6i9fPdcDC6rYm79 qfSNUF2VhqttgzTJhzWEOr0071l2ocxAuFtOe1H4= In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:30:58 +0900") Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:82867 Archived-At: Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Because at least I get used to start writing at the end of a message > buffer whatever exists above, so I'll simply move the point to the end > indiscreetly. Anyway, Gnus does well in encoding an unterminated > part. What is necessary in the end of a part is the buffer's end, or > an open tag of the next part, I believe. This will not help if the users wants to put the part inline. At the same time, it is not only about Gnus recognising the bounds of the individual parts - the end tag is an important visual marker for the user. I presume we can find a common ground here by adding a new option which conditions the addition of the end tag. Christopher