From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81603 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Scoring on basee64 encoded message body Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:21:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87aa3jgci7.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> References: Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331756701 27396 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2012 20:25:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:25:01 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29883@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Mar 14 21:24:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7uki-0002H4-VH for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:24:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S7ukb-0006MC-Gd; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:24:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S7uka-0006M2-Ih for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S7ukX-0005Uw-LT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S7ukV-0000XJ-L9 for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:24:43 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7ukV-00026E-CK for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:24:43 +0100 Original-Received: from p4fd3bec5.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.211.190.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:24:43 +0100 Original-Received: from Reiner.Steib by p4fd3bec5.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:24:43 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4fd3bec5.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: :6KQZ[nyoS_edmB.%gw-=)BYth^|2+Y+^cu%I$FSx!&>-'om>3H7A|M&n(V7fIo3P.;yo.b yq4$p;ZaBtkv)\}biaiBQe"mD}iib1AA@99-fZ7i*bLhNRVC&0Wkxg9)SH?oWc@{ Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4c/ufIj/9IwpJv9P+E2hQCL/i2k= X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81603 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 14 2012, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > But the more general issue is -- should scoring on bodies be done on the > decoded messages or the encoded messages? I think it would make more > sense to do it on decoded messages, Sure. I remember that we had this problem WRT mail splitting. And I'm a little surprised that `nnmail-mail-splitting-decodes' is nil by default. Probably because users might filter spam on "strange" charsets. > Scoring on headers are done on the decoded headers, right? So it would > be more consistent to decode the bodies, too. Wouldn't it? Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/