From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72794 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Private/public groups Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:14:44 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87aamovc6z.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286558112 28547 80.91.229.12 (8 Oct 2010 17:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:15:12 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21166@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Oct 08 19:15:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4GXF-0002ej-Do for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:15:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4GX7-0006nl-D5; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4GX6-0006nT-0S for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4GX1-0001J6-Hb for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:14:59 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P4GWz-0008ST-00 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:14:53 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4GWx-0002ZV-LV for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:14:51 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:14:51 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:14:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8ZGL3YcazJTGMBTCmKPYhaaTnYc= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72794 Archived-At: On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:40:12 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> So should there be, like, a ... super-setting, saying what privacy you LMI> want? Where the default would be "privacy in mail groups, but not in LMI> other groups"? I think it's better as "privacy if the image came from a writeable backend, open if it came from a read-only backend." The idea being that you get mail delivered to a writeable backend so spam has a chance to reach you there, whereas you seek out content in read-only backends so spam is much less likely to be targeted at you. Ted