From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70411 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Frank Schmitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug in nnimap? Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:33:07 +0200 Organization: Hamme net, kren mer och nimmi Message-ID: <87aanyhgvg.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de> References: <87occh2whw.fsf@gmx.ch> <871v9diap1.fsf@mid.gehheimdienst.de> <87tym6x1p8.fsf@pcuds33.cern.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283535313 14978 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 17:35:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 17:35:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18786=ding+2Daccount=gmane.org@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Sep 03 19:35:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OraAQ-0002WK-MS for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:35:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OraAQ-0008Cm-2c for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:35:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OraAP-0008Ch-98 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OraAN-0003pl-FH for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OraAM-0006oc-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:35:06 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OraAK-0002Po-4l for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:35:04 +0200 Original-Received: from zoidberg.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.69.172]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:35:04 +0200 Original-Received: from ich by zoidberg.uni-koblenz.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:35:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: zoidberg.uni-koblenz.de X-Face: :EL9TzGRN){7|oE2~xQ8Q(VjpjsXgX$~gi&rYD5J5p)$w\Thdl~v:7h`/n)J!8nXT%_+Wj6}@EHM8}QbA(9nX-wrQ:ch1%DauV[?kFasXUcnL#+"K8zOx&$@/M'/},q-eztaJra1|?C+p$h\2XnK-HB"8_U Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70411 Archived-At: Tibor Simko writes: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010, Frank Schmitt wrote: >> The solution is to turn off Gnus agent. > > BTW, due to similar issues, I have been running with agent off for IMAP > groups since ages. But incidentally I tried to re-test the agent > behaviour for IMAP groups afresh a few month ago, and it seems to have > worked much better than it used to N years ago. > > So, is anyone using agent with IMAP groups regularly these days? Or has > everyone switched to offlineimap or the like? Like I said before: I'd strongly vote for disabling the agent for nnimap by default. The whole point of IMAP is that several clients access the same mails on the central server but the agent just isn't up to this in my experience. -- Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns? Given that a signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages. Seize the opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about.