From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69949 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: overriding marks for synchronization Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:42 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87aaofxdk9.fsf@dod.no> References: <87eie6fzr5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874oevesp9.fsf@dod.no> <87lj85cbms.fsf@dod.no> <87pqxgdolm.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282465366 1310 80.91.229.12 (22 Aug 2010 08:22:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 08:22:46 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18335@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Aug 22 10:22:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On5pD-0002R7-A9 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:22:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1On5oQ-0004WS-Oe; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 03:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1On5oN-0004W5-9M for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 03:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1On5oL-0003Wo-Ng for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 03:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1On5oL-0007pT-00 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:49 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On5oK-0002BP-Uc for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:48 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no ([84.208.200.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:48 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:21:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q7OdMP6DhyrP1HYMgDL3sHYb6Zo= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69949 Archived-At: >>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > ... But I think gnus-sync.el can be used to synchronize more: the > topic hierarchy and parameters, for instance. Look forward to both types of functionality. What groups that overlap, I would like to have as similar behaviour as possible. Another thing that would have had nice to have synchronized, are those score rules that I've added manually, typically by doing `I' or `L' in the summary buffer of a group. I don't know how distinct this is from other stuff found in score files, though. > In this it also will be more powerful than gnus-agent.el and that's > why I didn't just use that code. Speaking of the agent... my netbook spends parts of its time in offline mode. Is it possible to handle the offline case? Would a particular tramp backend be better than others? E.g. would the imap backend be better than the ssh backend?