From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69768 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Header lines of commit messages Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:36:13 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87aaqc9xlu.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <83r5jucbvq.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4pldikb.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87hbkpn8d4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83eiftddbj.fsf@gnu.org> <87eiftn2lm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <838w61d5gs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277922999 20258 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2010 18:36:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 30 20:36:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU29F-0003QP-5N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55547 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU29E-0004iD-Lg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:36:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59425 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU298-0004hd-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU297-0005kh-7k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU297-0005kV-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU292-0003IK-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:24 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:24 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ykFAGU1+QTz567Fh2kmLwjbs9yw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126543 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69768 Archived-At: On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:16:51 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: EZ> In the Gnus case, I'd prefer more meaningful headers as well, but it's EZ> hard to ask for that when a large body of unrelated changes is EZ> delivered to Emacs at once. Katsumi Yamaoka has been doing the synchronization so far. Let him and the other Gnus developers know if there's a problem with the synchronization log messages. I plan to eventually set up a more automatic synchronization method. >> If you really *do* want to know about irrelevant commits, I don't >> understand why you find it acceptable that Gnus doesn't rebase its >> synchs into the mainline. EZ> Because I'm too old to fight Quixotic battles. And because people who EZ> do the job should have some leeway in determining how far they want to EZ> go towards the project to which they contribute. If Stefan and Yidong EZ> can live with what Gnus maintainers do when they synch, so can I. Sorry, I am not clear on the problem, though it's probably obvious to you. Can you explain what's the problem and what we can do on the Gnus side to remedy it? Thanks Ted