From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/68396 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Dovecot 1.2 virtual mailboxes Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:23:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87ab71ev9k.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87fxgvnz4k.fsf@escher.local.home> <8763hr2n0o.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <878wmmfb0s.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <8763hqf3uc.fsf@randomsample.de> <87iqlqdlnc.fsf_-_@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238502238 10672 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2009 12:23:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:23:58 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16833@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 31 14:25:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lod1g-0001D3-QT for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:25:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lod05-0004gV-Lw; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:23:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lod04-0004gA-9l for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Loczy-0005y1-BJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Lod0M-0002Zk-00 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:23:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042B6789B612 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:23:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12954-04 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:23:20 +0200 (CEST) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender vrfy tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (dhcp128.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.71.128]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170B6789B5E1 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:23:20 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (David Engster's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:35:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:68396 Archived-At: David Engster writes: Hi David, >> But probably the registry could jump in here (at least if I've read >> the message in the original group before and omit virtual groups from >> registration). > > Yes, I guess this could be scripted somehow, since the virtual groups > are in their own namespace anyway. But indeed, the registry would have > to see the original message in the original group beforehand. I > already struggled with that problem with nnmairix, and don't yet know > how to solve that efficiently, especially since I'm splitting with > procmail on the server and not with Gnus. Yes, I do so with SIEVE, too + some very restricted local fancy splitting with gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent. Therefore it would be nice to do the registration of messages not on reading them but somewhere after fetching and splitting. Bye, Tassilo