From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66166 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mother knows best References forcibly reinserted Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:15:26 +0800 Message-ID: <87abn4yrg1.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200611811 15867 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2008 23:16:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:16:51 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14657@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Jan 18 00:17:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JFdyu-0004ag-Dz for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:17:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JFdxU-0000pV-QI; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:15:40 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JFdxT-0000pA-A5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:15:39 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JFdxN-0005oq-KG for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:15:39 -0600 Original-Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5] helo=blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1JFdxO-0000bO-00 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:15:35 +0100 Original-Received: from jidanni1 (122-127-34-10.dynamic.hinet.net [122.127.34.10]) by blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8765C922 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:15:28 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.1.9 2007-02-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.2668 Ham tokens: 0.000-4165--9764h-5s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-3866--9063h-5s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.001-19--44h-0s--0d--reiner, 0.001-17--39h-0s--0d--Reiner, 0.013-2--4h-0s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:208.113.200.5 Spam tokens: 0.958-1--0h-1s--0d--H*RU:sk:122-127, 0.958-1--0h-1s--0d--H*r:sk:122-127, 0.958-1--0h-1s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:122-127, 0.947-3030--1332h-56211s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.947-3030--1332h-56211s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name -0.2 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.2668] -0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66166 Archived-At: TZ> We're discussing this issue in another thread, and we (at least me and TZ> Reiner) are obviously aware of it. Is there a reason you didn't follow TZ> up in that thread? I only am on my NNTP machine to Gmane every three days, and never imagined that you found the same bug, so went ahead and posted without checking the Gmane HTTP interface first. Hope the bug gets fixed soon.