From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/66019 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: gnus-summary-catchup-and-exit: say number Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:52:45 +0800 Message-ID: <87abnp9k8i.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199231626 24971 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2008 23:53:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:53:46 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M14512@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jan 02 00:54:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J9qvu-0006a2-0d for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:54:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J9qup-0006vR-0X; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:52:59 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1J9qun-0006v6-6L for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:52:57 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1J9qum-0000KN-JP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:52:57 -0600 Original-Received: from lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5] helo=blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1J9qum-0006vH-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:52:56 +0100 Original-Received: from jidanni1 (122-127-32-223.dynamic.hinet.net [122.127.32.223]) by blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8203B5CE49 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:52:51 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.1.9 2007-02-13) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.4967 Ham tokens: 0.000-2831--9393h-6s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-2611--8666h-6s--0d--H*MI:fsf, 0.049-1--1h-0s--2d--432, 0.063-4641--24472h-2750s--0d--H*M:org, 0.075-10689--64089h-8666s--0d--H*r:Postfix Spam tokens: 0.962-4651--1270h-53959s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.962-4651--1270h-53959s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.943-3848--1893h-52315s--0d--H*r:quimby.gnus.org, 0.939-3690--2054h-52345s--0d--H*r:3.35, 0.936-3651--2176h-53105s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org Autolearn status: no 1.0 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4967] -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:66019 Archived-At: Enhancement idea for gnus-summary-catchup-and-exit: Instead of Mark all unread articles as read? (y or n) Say Mark all 432 unread articles as read? (y or n) Same for gnus-summary-catchup. Lets one get an idea of the gravity of what one is doing.