From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64073 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus crashes on threads deeper than 333 articles Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:33 -0500 Message-ID: <87ac23xz0i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87wt58emyz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165259163 15532 80.91.229.10 (4 Dec 2006 19:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 20:06:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GrJ8b-0002MI-04 for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:06:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrJ8a-0000wE-UJ for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GrJ8T-0000uj-E6 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GrJ8S-0000uR-4F for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GrJ8R-0000uO-TS for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GrJ8R-0005B4-8B for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:05:51 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GrJ8L-0008NB-ET for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:05:45 +0100 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.19.1.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:05:45 +0100 Original-Received: from cyd by cyd.mit.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:05:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cyd.mit.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NYH3NNiUH2z8QPeUqP7EsAgf7co= X-BeenThere: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for CVS Emacs." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:15449 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64073 Archived-At: Reiner Steib writes: > I searched the archives and I only found one more report about this > problem, so it seems to be a *very rare* situation. I'm not sure if > such a change should be made now (in the stable series). > > What about providing an option and keep the current recursive as > default? See the patch below (`gnus-sort-threads-loop' is your > function). I think this is a good approach. > Is your implementation faster or slower than the recursion? After testing it on several comp.* newsgroups, I concluded that the performance difference is statistically insignificant.