From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57048 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Losing tickmarks in nnimap groups Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:47:13 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87ad1c19ou.fsf@dod.no> References: <87u102dhlp.fsf@dod.no> <8765chl5ur.fsf@dod.no> <87wu4xjr0n.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082126727 13359 80.91.224.253 (16 Apr 2004 14:45:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5588@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 16 16:45:18 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BEUaj-00030M-00 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:45:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BEUac-0003rM-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BEQsR-0003BD-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BEQsQ-0004lX-Ig for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:47:18 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DC23A0026 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:47:16 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BEQsN-0003dA-00 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:47:15 +0200 Original-Received: from gw.computas.com ([193.71.42.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:47:15 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by gw.computas.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:47:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 51 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.computas.com Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8V/Fw+SsUSRcRoTabRMAlK8oGlQ= Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57048 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57048 To: Steinar Bang References: <87u102dhlp.fsf@dod.no> <8765chl5ur.fsf@dod.no> <87wu4xjr0n.fsf@dod.no> X-Home-Page: http://www.arshinov.com X-Face: BZNn/X_/tfdOHrnCOwX(~gGwNn+:XmdKGuLpa(v)=.{fdfr__Kk+`/u?f)lb^XONsMWB>~j Y|a0Z7f\N[\vQ4j!,=[GT,u]rkG,L#mn-A$$et %E=&[r=Sm3{|=V&yj(l*-hKSS*Bto+ From: Gleb Arshinov Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:27:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87wu4xjr0n.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Sat, 03 Apr 2004 12:27:04 +0200") Message-ID: <86hdvkdax2.fsf@badger.barsook.com> Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter, i586-pc-linux) Subject: Re: Losing tickmarks in nnimap groups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain >>>>> Steinar Bang : >> I've only seen this since I started using the agent. I started >> using the agent on nnimap in mid-March (on March 19 to be >> exact), and have seen it twice since then. Steinar> I saw this happen on the same nnimap group twice. This Steinar> group had a lot of _old_ (as in early 2002) ticked Steinar> articles, and a lot of read articles between the ticked Steinar> articles. [Can't seem to post for some reason, hence email followup. Feel free to post this to gnus.ding, just withOUT my email] Steinar, I've investigated and reported this bug before. "Holey" mailboxes like you describe will trigger it. The root cause seems that when UID SEARCH UID fails, nnimap ends up deleting/expiring all articles involed in this UID SEARCH UID command. UID SEARCH UID seems to fail on large lists of sequences. In Exchange case "large" is pretty small :-), but I've seen similar problems on very large "holey" mailboxes on uw-imapd. See http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=86u1c37rwi.fsf%40badger.barsook.com for full description/trace/etc. Gleb