From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39949 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Matt Armstrong" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is this a buglet.. nndrafts:draft renegades Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 14:10:37 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87ady3ef1u.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> References: <20011102214600.0ED71BD48@squeaker.lickey.com> <2nk7x7vr6n.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <20011103193251.CBC04BD25@squeaker.lickey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175578 30680 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 16607 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2001 21:11:37 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2001 21:11:37 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16084Q-000265-00; Sat, 03 Nov 2001 15:11:14 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 03 Nov 2001 15:10:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04465 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 15:10:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 16567 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2001 21:10:57 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16562 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2001 21:10:57 -0000 Original-Received: from hank.lickey.com (64.81.100.235) by gnus.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2001 21:10:57 -0000 Original-Received: from squeaker.lickey.com (squeaker.lickey.com [192.168.100.10]) by hank.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC732EE30 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:10:42 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFFDBD48 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:10:42 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45DA6BD2A; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:10:41 -0700 (MST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 42 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA v0.40/Python 1.5.2 (linux2) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20010714 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39949 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39949 "Matt Armstrong" writes: > I agree that if you C-x k the buffer, it shouldn't end up in the > drafts buffer. Actually, I reverse my opinion. C-x k deletes a buffer, not a file. I have C-x C-s C-x k deeply ingrained in my muscle memory -- it is the "save to disk, then delete buffer" key sequence. Data does not get lost when doing this. If C-x k suddenly deletes the message out of the drafts folder, I'll end up accidentally deleting drafts left and right. > ShengHuo ZHU writes: > >> I knew the bug. If most users think that it is bad, I can fix it >> later today or tomorrow. >> >>>> I've brought this up twice before on ding, and no one's responded >>>> :-(. >>> >>> It works for me. What is C-c C-k bound to? >> >> The binding is fine. Just need to add a kill-action. > > Fine by me, and Harry too. ;-) Not fine by me any more. I like the idea that a message I'm editing is actually a file, and that if it saved (via auto-save or not), it is around until I explicitly delete it. I'd be fine if message buffers prompted me "delete message from drafts folder too?" when they were killed. Or we could provide a "kill this message buffer and its draft" key binding. -- matt