From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37506
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Large *.pif base64 attachments and Gnus...
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 09:42:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87ae1f9cme.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <m3r8uwae5m.fsf@SnowWhite.SuSE.cz>
	<ylitg6yn7u.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
	<m3wv4lmwz4.fsf@SnowWhite.SuSE.cz> <87puabq0wh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<m3zo9f4mx3.fsf@SnowWhite.SuSE.cz>
	<ilud76bs8hb.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172909 14247 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:01:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Original-Received: (qmail 1403 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 07:24:00 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 07:24:00 -0000
Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de)
	via LF.net GmbH Internet Services
	via remoteip 212.9.163.29
	via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp
	for mail.gnus.org
	id m15TIGR-001X1fC; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 09:23:55 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim)
	by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 15TIFx-0004nh-00; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 09:23:25 +0200
Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 15TIYD-0000Bf-00; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 09:42:17 +0200
Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?=)
In-Reply-To: <ilud76bs8hb.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's
 message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2001 01:36:48 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7
Original-Lines: 12
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37506
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37506

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

>>   > It is a bug in 'base64-decode-region'.  Perhaps it's fixed in Emacs
>>   > 21, I don't know.  The base64 encoding is indeed incorrect, and that's
>> 
>> huh, I use 21 :-( So I will report this bug to appropriate mailing
>> list. Thank you.
> 
> No, there's nothing wrong with `base64-decode-region', Gnus simply
> catches the error and message it.

On Emacs 20, there is. ;-)