From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36030 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: what's available in fancy-split functions? Date: 26 Apr 2001 16:40:18 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Message-ID: <87ae53iedp.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <878zkoppm6.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171685 6418 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:41:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 10944 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2001 20:40:39 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 10939 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2001 20:40:37 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2001 20:40:37 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA00034 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 22:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: h0000f81fb397.ne.mediaone.net Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 988317623 4644 24.91.252.241 (26 Apr 2001 20:40:23 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2001 20:40:23 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 17 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36030 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36030 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > > (save-restriction > > (widen) > > ... > > Yes, this has been suggested a couple of weeks ago. Yes, I just noticed that right after I posted my original question. (oops!) > message-fetch-field? Thanks, this is just what I was looking for. -- Josh Huber