From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35065
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: `user-mail-address' for message-ids
Date: 28 Feb 2001 02:05:59 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87ae77obuw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <20010223133030.B14991@mastaler.com>
	<m3elwpi07k.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<puid7c9c9y7.fsf@mastaler.com>
	<m31ysphvj5.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<pui4rxlc8ij.fsf@mastaler.com>
	<vafhf1knv10.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilupug8qc1j.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<puipug4nihc.fsf@cyan.acl.lanl.gov> <rjlmqsovy4.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
	<puiy9usm27v.fsf@cyan.acl.lanl.gov> <rj4rxgoucz.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
	<87u25fep46.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <puiofvnk7at.fsf@cyan.acl.lanl.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170868 1008 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:27:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8874CD049D
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:09:42 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB25882;
	Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:09:32 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:08:52 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA17329
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:08:39 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mail.netic.de (mail.s.netic.de [212.9.160.11])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AE7D049D
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:09:11 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de)
	via LF.net GmbH Internet Services
	via remoteip 212.9.163.2
	via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp
	for mail.gnus.org
	id m14Xv78-001Wy4C; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:09:10 +0100 (CET)
Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 14Xusv-0001cA-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:54:29 +0100
Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 14Xv44-0000OT-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:06:00 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <puiofvnk7at.fsf@cyan.acl.lanl.gov> ("Jason R. Mastaler"'s message of "27 Feb 2001 16:58:02 -0700")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Original-Lines: 10
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35065
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35065

"Jason R. Mastaler" <jason@mastaler.com> writes:

> I'm all for a better RHS than (system-name), but why stick "gnus.org"
> in there.  This looks too much like a fqdn.

So-called standards and common practice mandates a FQDN there.  In
addition, if you post to some groups with a semantically incorrect
message ID, you're going to be flamed to death.

Sorry, the FQDN issue is not open to discussion.