From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 27274 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2021 09:58:40 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Jan 2021 09:58:40 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l0iLv-00FMVr-43 for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:58:39 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l0iLu-006RIY-H3 for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:58:38 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l0iLt-006RIT-QC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:58:37 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l0iLq-003qPt-WC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 03:58:37 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=v9eaWKZeO7vps2i3vRaX3G2QHAiwjkbHDhWL3TrPqZc=; b=OIcuky0KaavCHgUmcxlYfDEbY8 uPa9UNXdlIPhCYprfHC5xp10ikTuB6K17XYEqkn5c+neP5o3XTrTd6pTQHBDA5U9nSAQkXNXQuLTu AyJ0E74xOd3fsj9CugeabxsLP6m7q6x8ai1mJ8OIDfsvpCsgMyUFJdH+8H2nj4H03a2c=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0iLj-0002SA-Hj for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:58:30 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0iLi-0004LH-61 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:58:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: unticking Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 10:54:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87bldpcilm.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87zh1aefqu.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <877doe8mid.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TFe9YWlEVyQIrfNsSdRsGMbIquI= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: >>> I just wanted to remove some tick marks on ticked messages >>> and realized that there is no such function. >> >> Both M-u (gnus-summary-clear-mark-forward) and >> d (gnus-summary-mark-as-read-forward) will untick >> the message. > > Thanks Andreas, just i did mark this thread as "tick" because > i also use often this rule ticking ("!"). Thanks again ^^^ I _think_ I use `gnus-summary-tick-article-forward', then `gnus-summary-mark-as-read-forward'... -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal