From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Gnus and ewws
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:51:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bny0f2j6.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877g8opgww.fsf@descartes.rss.mhs.man.ac.uk>
Matt Ford <matt@dancingfrog.co.uk> writes:
> Do shr and ewws have the same DNA? It seems eww does a better job at
> rendering web pages than shr does at rendering messages...
Do you mean shr and "eww"? I'm pretty sure that eww mostly uses shr
under the hood, as it were.
What kinds of differences do you see?
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Apparantly I was misinformed." Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-21 16:30 Matt Ford
2014-02-21 23:51 ` Adam Sjøgren [this message]
2014-02-22 3:40 ` Steinar Bang
2014-02-22 8:33 ` Adam Sjøgren
2014-03-05 14:07 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bny0f2j6.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk \
--to=asjo@koldfront.dk \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).