* message-position-on-field, push-mark
@ 2011-12-04 15:19 Philipp Haselwarter
2012-01-03 21:01 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philipp Haselwarter @ 2011-12-04 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would
`push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you
could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC.
Just a thought…
--
Philipp Haselwarter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark
2011-12-04 15:19 message-position-on-field, push-mark Philipp Haselwarter
@ 2012-01-03 21:01 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-07 1:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2012-01-03 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philipp Haselwarter; +Cc: ding
Philipp Haselwarter <philipp.haselwarter@gmx.de> writes:
> Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would
> `push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you
> could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC.
`message-position-on-field' isn't a command, but a function used
internally by other commands, so it would be inappropriate for it to
push the mark.
But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
friends) to push the mark... What do people think?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark
2012-01-03 21:01 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2012-01-07 1:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-07 6:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-01-07 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:01:22 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
LMI> Philipp Haselwarter <philipp.haselwarter@gmx.de> writes:
>> Wouldn't it be practical if `message-position-on-field' would
>> `push-mark' ? Then when you go change a header while editing a mail you
>> could get back to where you were with a simple C-u C-SPC.
LMI> `message-position-on-field' isn't a command, but a function used
LMI> internally by other commands, so it would be inappropriate for it to
LMI> push the mark.
LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
LMI> friends) to push the mark... What do people think?
I'd be OK with that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark
2012-01-07 1:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-01-07 6:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-07 13:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2012-01-07 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
> LMI> friends) to push the mark... What do people think?
>
> I'd be OK with that.
It's a "new feature", though, so it'll have to wait...
I think we'll have to open a new branch soon, or I'll go insane. :-)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark
2012-01-07 6:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2012-01-07 13:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-26 19:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-01-07 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:20:45 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
LMI> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
LMI> But it might be appropriate for commands like `message-goto-to' (and
LMI> friends) to push the mark... What do people think?
>>
>> I'd be OK with that.
LMI> It's a "new feature", though, so it'll have to wait...
LMI> I think we'll have to open a new branch soon, or I'll go insane. :-)
Yeah, make your own branch, go wild. It's really easy and cheap to
manage branches with Git so don't worry about it.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark
2012-01-07 13:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-01-26 19:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-26 22:43 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2012-01-26 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
> Yeah, make your own branch, go wild. It's really easy and cheap to
> manage branches with Git so don't worry about it.
I think the way to proceed is to create a No Gnus branch (for bug
fixes), and then continue development on the trunk. Perhaps.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: message-position-on-field, push-mark
2012-01-26 19:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2012-01-26 22:43 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-01-26 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:01:01 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
LI> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> Yeah, make your own branch, go wild. It's really easy and cheap to
>> manage branches with Git so don't worry about it.
LI> I think the way to proceed is to create a No Gnus branch (for bug
LI> fixes), and then continue development on the trunk. Perhaps.
Works For Me.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-26 22:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-04 15:19 message-position-on-field, push-mark Philipp Haselwarter
2012-01-03 21:01 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-07 1:57 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-07 6:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-07 13:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-26 19:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-26 22:43 ` Ted Zlatanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).