From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80514 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: *bump* again Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:07:39 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87bosr7tx0.fsf@dod.no> References: <1318133487-45386-1-git-send-email-dave@boostpro.com> <82botobfzu.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320422902 15214 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2011 16:08:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 16:08:22 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28797@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Nov 04 17:08:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMMJT-0004LC-Si for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:08:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RMMJG-0002P5-Ss; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RMMJF-0002On-6G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RMMJ4-0003Ce-LN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RMMJ3-0004G9-8c for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:07:49 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RMMJ3-00048d-4f for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:07:49 +0100 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.231.161.getinternet.no ([84.208.231.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:07:49 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.231.161.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:07:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.231.161.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:N6J5YOHzDEEkpoNQfo2EnPtQxPU= X-Spam-Score: -6.1 (------) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80514 Archived-At: >>>>> Dave Abrahams : > It would be simpler if the development branch *was* master and one > could branch for release, instead. Um... in what way would that be simpler...? AFAIK other than being the name of the branch created by default, when creating a new git repo, there's nothing special with the master branch compared with any other tracking branch.