From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69865 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Accessing all incoming mails, checking for network connection, changes in message status Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:07:15 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87bp9jcy70.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <7saapinvff.fsf@fi.upm.es> <87eieqx7xm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <7smxtdrt12.fsf@fi.upm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280862490 30679 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2010 19:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 19:08:10 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18252@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Aug 03 21:08:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgMqN-0000tX-Ho for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:08:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OgMqB-0005yh-Cc; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:07:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OgMqA-0005yV-7a for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OgMq8-0007UD-N8 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OgMq7-00030F-00 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:07:51 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgMq6-0000mI-MD for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:07:50 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:07:50 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:07:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 45 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:J42dLHyQDdNesSFRDXh7j9TRM3g= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69865 Archived-At: On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:47:05 +0200 Manuel Carro wrote: >> Virtual groups should do this. Otherwise you're reinventing the same >> functionality. So if the only problem is that the GCC field is wrong, >> let's fix that. Or is there another reason why virtual groups are not >> what you want? MC> I have a virtual group which puts together all mail, so that when I MC> enter the group I see all unread and ticked articles. But these MC> articles have already been spooled to the corresponding groups. What I MC> would like is to receive all mail in a single group (that is easy) and, MC> as I read the messages, respool them to other groups using a set of MC> rules and "B t" (basically the ones I have now). It is the second part I did not MC> manage to find how to do, as it seems that at the moment I set up MC> splitting rules the mail start to be split. Yeah, splitting rules are not meant to be optional. But they can call ELisp! So make a function that normally returns the "main" group, but make it operate differently (returning nil) when invoked interactively. (defvar pass-through nil) (defun my-special-splitter () (if pass-through nil "main group name here")) Now you just have to a) insert this function in your split rules before anything else, and b) advise or override `B t' inside a lambda that sets pass-through to t before the call and sets it back to nil afterwards. Look in the splitting rules section of the manual for more details. It's not too bad. >> This indicates article marks are inconsistent. Is this over IMAP or >> another protocol? Could the server be modifying article numbers behind >> Gnus' back? MC> It is over IMAP, but use IMAP to copy the mail messages over to my MC> machine and I the processing is done locally after my mail has been MC> downloaded. I do not think the article numbers are being modified, MC> then. OK. I'm not sure what's going on then. Ted